Home

Ateneans Act!
Written by Administrator   
Friday, 07 March 2008
Ateneans for Accountability and Truth

On 26 February 2008, a group of concerned alumni from different batches met to discuss how the Ateneo community can reach out to others and express "communal action" amidst the deepening crisis, arising from a series of scandals, the threat to the life of Jun Lozada, and other iniquities. The sentiment is that we, "men and women for others," have to be one with our fellow Filipinos in resolving this profound crisis. What unites is our resolve to fight for truth, justice and accountability. The statement titled Ateneans Act (Ateneans for Accountability and Truth) serves as the basis of our unity and action.

This is an inclusive project. We hope this will serve as an outlet for the Ateneo alumni to participate in the search for truth, justice and accountability. We invite alumni/alumnae to join us by signing this statement and participating in other activities.

Please forward the statement to our classmates, fellow alumni, sons and daughters, and other concerned citizens.

Ad Majorem Dei Gloriam

We, members of the Ateneo community, address this statement to our Jesuit mentors, faculty members, fellow alumni/ae and, most specially, our countrymen, to express our resolve to live up to the ideals of our beloved alma mater in serving country and people.

Formed to become men and women for others, alas, some of our brothers and sisters who have held and/or are still holding positions of influence in government and private business have allowed themselves to become tools of oppression and exploitation by those who only choose to serve themselves. Indeed, some of these fellow alumni/ae are themselves the initiators and perpetrators of these iniquities.

Where fraternal conscientization and correction in true Ignatian-Jesuit tradition should have “washed away – not moderated – the spirit of greed” in the hearts of these “vulture-ized” members of the “eagles’ nest,” we, their brothers and sisters, can no longer observe at the sidelines. It is time for us to take action.

The nation suffers; institutions of democracy are as carcasses savaged by such vulture greed.

Today we can only look back to Ateneo’s storied, nearly 150-year, past where a Dr. Jose Rizal once attended its classrooms, imbibed valued lessons in the humanities, thence epitomized genuine humanity by living the life of a “man for others,” and by it and for it, dying a martyr for country and people. And we feel proud and blessed by his heroism. Whereas today, too, looking at present events, we, Ateneans, are associated with an aberration of humanity called “Jose Pidal”! And we are shamed by that name’s ignominy!

LUX IN DOMINO: Light in the Lord. This is our school’s motto. We grant that some of our fellow Ateneans holding office in government, according to their best lights, continue to serve in the belief that the light they hold might help mitigate the darkness cast by the incorrigibly greedy few. Alas, wittingly or unwittingly, their illumination merely acts as sporadic blinding glare for others not yet aware of the darkness that has swallowed the body politic. Theirs is the glint of fool’s gold.

To these we quote from Mt. 6:23: “If your eyes are diseased your whole body will be in darkness. Then, if your light has become darkness, how dark will be the darkest part of you!”

To these fellow Ateneans in government, particularly in the executive branch which holds the helm of governance, we implore you: HARK BACK TO YOUR ROOTS: LUX IN DOMINO. Be one with us in humbly asking for the forgiveness of our countrymen for letting them down during their time of need – in these trying times when many of you – and us – could have been instruments of the Light, inspiring hope and serving our fellowmen…AD MAJOREM DEI GLORIAM!

Therefore, by way of fraternal correction and restitution for our collective acts of omission and commission, we humbly ask you, fellow Ateneans who continue to help prop up this administration that is collapsing by the sheer weight of its iniquities, to resign your posts and join the ranks of the majority of our countrymen who are SEEKING TRUTH, ACCOUNTABILITY, JUSTICE AND DECENCY in government.

RESIGN NOW AND BE THE LIGHT IN THE LORD!

Read the Filipino version, click here.

Sign the Statement | Print Statement | Email to a Friend

Comments (3)

 
Jess Martinez Airs His Side
Written by Manuel Buencamino   
Wednesday, 04 June 2008

Buencamino is a fellow of Action for Economic Reforms. This article was published in the Business Mirror, June 4,2008 edition, p. A10.

Securities and Exchange Commissioner Jesus Martinez, Commission on Higher Education Chair Romulo Neri, and Supreme Court Justice Renato Corona were batch mates at the Ateneo de Manila High School (ADMHS).

ADMHS '66 calls itself the "MOBB" (Men of Blue Blood) because they were dubbed mga balasubas by one of their teachers. Romy Neri's Senate testimony surprised and disappointed many of his batch mates. Rene Corona's concurring vote and opinion on Romy Neri's case elicited a similar reaction. Much was expected of Romy and Rene because they were in the honors class.

Jess was not in the honors class. He was just one of the boys, as the saying goes. Still, I was a bit put off when I heard he signed a cease and desist order against Meralco based on a complaint filed by Winston Garcia, the hand puppet of Bonnie and Clyde.

Be first to comment this article

Read more...
 
Going Beyond the Disappointment
Written by Boyet Dy   
Wednesday, 14 May 2008

The “Guidelines for Communal Discernment and Action” that was circulated by the Philippine Province of the Society of Jesus Commission on the Social Apostolate last Easter Sunday was the Philippine Daily Inquirer’s “Talk of the Town” on April 6 and April 13. This should be a welcome development; as stated in the accompanying endorsement letter from Jesuit Provincial Fr. Danny Huang, the invitation was precisely that “communities and institutions read, reflect, pray over and discuss these Guidelines.”

I was able to read critical reactions to the Guidelines. It seems that the overriding sentiment is disappointment over the Guidelines’ failure to join calls for resignation.

I should have been disturbed too. I was Ateneo Student Council president when the “Hello, Garci” scandal broke out and, at that time, we called for President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo’s resignation. I have even recently reiterated my call for Ms Arroyo to resign within my own circles at the height of Jun Lozada’s whistle-blowing. I maintain that calling for her resignation and punishing her and her family members and minions who brazenly drag their weight around are legitimate and appropriate demands because of their accountability to acts of corruption and abuse of power that ultimately undermine hard-won institutions, delay reforms that demand time and crush the hope of the Filipino people.

Nevertheless, I was not disappointed by the Guidelines. It seems that the disappointment is misplaced since it is premised on two misinterpretations.

Be first to comment this article

Read more...
 
Intellectual Dishonesty
Written by Manuel Buencamino and Filomeno Sta. Ana III   
Tuesday, 06 May 2008

Columnist John Nery (Armchair Radicals, Philippine Daily Inquirer, 22 April 2008) asserted that we "have committed the old crime known in the free-spirited Sixties as libel by label," and he wants us "to account for (our) intellectual dishonesty."

Nery responded vociferously to our piece, titled "Jesuitic Placebo," which was published in the Inquirer's Talk of the Town, 13 April 2008). Our essay was a criticism of the Guidelines of the Philippine Jesuits' Commission on the Social Apostolate.

Our main argument was that the Jesuits' Commission paper devalued the call for Mrs. Gloria Arroyo to resign and the need for people power to effect Mrs. Arroyo's resignation. We likewise argued that, absent the frame of Arroyo's resignation, the Commission's recommended action, especially having an independent counsel, would become a distraction and a waste of resources.

Be first to comment this article

Read more...
 
Initial Response to Nery
Written by Manuel Buencamino, ADMU Alumnus   
Wednesday, 23 April 2008

Your reply to our criticism of the Jesuit guidelines for action was to label us Armchair Radicals.

You wrote,

“Buencamino and Sta. Ana have committed the old crime known in the free-spirited Sixties as libel by label; it will do all of us who take part in the public discourse good if we say so plainly—and call them to account for their intellectual dishonesty…The thrust of the Buencamino and Sta. Ana critique can be summed up neatly enough in the label in its title: “Jesuitic placebo.” Essentially, they criticize the guidelines as an exercise in casuistry, in merely clever double talk.”

Eto yun.

Unang una, libel is committed against a person not a thing.

Our article, Jesuitic Placebo, criticizes the statement of the Jesuits. If after reading our criticism you concluded we were calling the authors of the “guidelines” a bunch of switiks eh that’s because it’s impossible to separate an author from his creation…unless, of course you use switik methods.

Be first to comment this article

Read more...